Helen Woodward

UX Case Study

Simplifying pet adoption, one perfect match at a time.

Project Overview

My role
Sole contributor
Project type
Responsive web design
Duration
6 weeks
Tool
Figma
My role
Sole contributor
Project type
Responsive web design
Duration
6 weeks
Tool
Figma

Problem

Many potential adopters struggle to find pets that match their lifestyle, preferences, and home environment. The adoption process can feel overwhelming, with limited tools to filter options and navigate next steps seamlessly.

Objective

To design an intuitive adoption platform that helps users find their ideal pet match through guided filters, personality-based recommendations, and a streamlined adoption process.

Solution

Introducing an enhanced adoption experience! The new and improved Helen Woodward platform simplifies pet adoption by allowing users to filter for specific traits, take a pet-matching quiz, view detailed pet profiles with videos, and seamlessly complete the adoption process—all in one place.

Research Background

Research Goal

To understand the behaviors, needs, and challenges that potential pet adopters face when searching for, selecting, and adopting a pet through the Helen Woodward platform.

Research Methods

Secondary Research

Analyzed existing pet adoption platforms (e.g., Petfinder, Adopt-a-Pet, ASPCA) to identify industry standards, user expectations, and adoption processes. Researched how potential adopters currently search for, evaluate, and adopt pets online.

User Interviews

Conducted in-depth interviews with previous pet adopters to gain firsthand insights into their experiences, challenges, and expectations when searching for and adopting pets online.

  • Participants: 5 individuals (3 woman, 2 men)
  • Age Range: 31 to 68 years old
  • Methodology: Semi-structured user interviews exploring pet adoption preferences, previous experiences, and decision-making factors.

Competitive Analysis

Examined competing pet adoption platforms to identify strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for Helen Woodward to enhance the adoption experience.

S.D. Humane
Society
Animal care, adoption, and law
Strong community engagement
Medical care and behavioral training
Many locations and robust operations
Well-funded through donations
Strong volunteer support
No digital adoption process
Program awareness is low
High operational costs
R.C Humane
Society
Personalized adoptions
Pet food bank and grief support
Education and community programs
Local partnerships with vets
Responsible pet programs
Community-focused adoptions
No full digital adoption process
Smaller local reach
Limited volunteer resources
Best Friends
Animal Society
Nationwide shelter partnerships
Large rescue and rehab programs
Extensive online pet care resources
National rescue network
Strong donor support
Specialized care for at-risk pets
Website navigation issues
Program awareness is low
High operational costs
Animal Rescue
Foundation
Overcrowded shelter rescues
Post-adoption training and support
Humane care and welfare education
Strong foster care network
Experienced team of staffers
Extensive pet care training programs
No digital adoption process
Limited public visibility
Volunteer shortages

Based on the research findings, Helen Woodward could strengthen its position in the pet adoption space by offering a seamless digital adoption experience that enhances pet discovery, provides transparent pet history and care details, integrates adoption support services, enables appointment scheduling for meet-and-greets, and fosters a more accessible, community-driven adoption process.

Affinity Mapping

I used affinity mapping to organize and analyze data from user interviews, grouping insights into key themes and patterns to understand adopter preferences, challenges, and expectations throughout the pet adoption process.

Affinity Map Insights

Living situations matter

Amount of space, number of existing pets, and rental rules influence adoption choices

Past experiences shape expectations

Previous pet adoptions impact preferences for chosen shelters or rescues

Pet history transparency

Adopters want clear medical and behavioral records before committing to adopting a pet

Streamlined process preferred

Minimal paperwork and online applications make the experience smoother and easier

Meet-and-greets are expected

Many adopters want in-person interactions before deciding to move forward

Communication is Key

Slow or unclear responses from shelters deter potential adopters

Post-adoption support matters

Training resources and vet recommendations are expected by adopters

Personalized matches are valued

Lifestyle-based pet recommendations improve adoption success

Customer Journey Map

The customer journey map was created using insights from secondary research, five interviews, an affinity map, and an empathy map. It outlines the key actions, goals, emotions, and challenges users experience throughout each stage of the bartering process.

Awareness
Frank researches online and asks friends about the pet adoption process, feeling unsure where to start
Consideration
Frank explores different adoption websites, comparing available pets, requirements, and adoption fees
Service
Frank finalizes the adoption, picks up his new pet, and looks for resources on training and pet care
Acquisition
Frank selects a pet he’s interested in and begins filling out the adoption application
Loyalty
Frank shares his adoption experience online and recommends the platform to friends considering adoption

POVs and HMWs

I created POV (Point of View) and HMW (How Might We) statements to clearly define the user's needs and challenges.

Research takeaways

Barriers to pet adoption

Users feel overwhelmed by the adoption process, unsure where to start or what steps to take

Decision-making factors

Key considerations include pet temperament, medical history, and compatibility with their lifestyle

Lack of centralized information

Adopters want one platform that provides clear details on available pets, adoption steps, and resources

Concerns over long-term commitment

Adopters worry about the cost and time commitment, especially for senior or special-needs pets

Desire for timeline transparency

Potential adopters want to know how long the process takes and what to expect at each stage

Emotional connections drive adoptions

Adopters rely on photos, videos, and pet stories to feel connected before making adoption decisions

Limited search and matching

Some facilities lack filtering and matching capabilities, making it difficult to find pets that meet specific needs

Financial considerations impact decisions

Adopters appreciate financial transparency, including fees, medical costs, and available support services

Need for post-adoption resources

Users value post-adoption support like vet recommendations, training guides, and integration tips

Product Roadmapping

Project Goals

Based on my research, I formulated the following goals to guide the direction of the design.

  • Simplify pet discovery with better filtering and matching tools to help adopters find the right pets
  • Ease adoption concerns by providing clear details on pet history, care needs, and costs
  • Boost user confidence with transparent adoption steps, detailed profiles, and real testimonials
  • Streamline adoption by improving application workflows and adding progress indicators
  • Support special-needs and senior pets by showcasing their traits and educating adopters
  • Promote long-term success with post-adoption resources, training tips, and care essentials
  • Foster community by connecting adopters with shelters, support networks, and other owners

Feature Matrix

I had to narrow down the list of features for this project due to time constraints, focusing on those that would deliver the most immediate value to users. To achieve this, I created a feature matrix, ranking features as high, medium, or low priority.

High priority

Online applications

Profile tags

Video content

Enhanced pet profiles

Notification system

Medium priority

Pet-matching quiz

Pet recommendations

Highlighted/featured pets

Health records

Filtering capabilities

Remote communications

Progress tracker

Adoption kits

Search feature

Low priority

Adoption events

Adopter dashboard

Online applications
Profile tags
Video content
Enhanced pet profiles
Notifications
Pet-matching questionnaire
Pet recommendations
Highlighted pets
Health records
Filtering capabilities
Remote communications
Progress tracker
Adoption kits
Search feature
Adoption events
Adopter dashboard

Key Features

Based on user insights and research, I identified the most impactful features to enhance the Helen Woodward adoption experience, focusing on pet matching, adoption process clarity, and post-adoption resources.

Comprehensive pet profiles

Provide detailed pet histories, including temperament, medical background, and care requirements

Transparent adoption process

Offer clear step-by-step guidance, progress indicators, and expected timelines for adopters

Schedule meet-and-greets

Allow users to book appointments to meet pets before completing the adoption process

Smart pet matching

Use advanced filters and personalized recommendations to help adopters find pets that meet their needs

Adoption essentials

Enable adopters to purchase necessary pet supplies and starter bundles directly through the platform

Post-adoption resources

Provide training guides, vet recommendations, and ongoing pet care tips to ensure long-term success

Information Architecture

Sitemap

I created a sitemap based on results of the open card sort to establish the information architecture, ensuring a logical and intuitive structure for the platform that allows users to easily navigate and access key features.

Interaction Design

User Flows

This user flow illustrates how adopters navigate the pet adoption process, covering key interactions from discovering available pets to submitting an adoption application. By mapping out these flows, I ensured a seamless experience that helps users efficiently find a pet that meets their needs, complete the necessary steps, and finalize their adoption with clarity and ease.

Low-fidelity Wireframes

I created low-fidelity wireframes to outline the basic layout and structure, allowing me to quickly visualize and refine the overall design before moving into more detailed iterations.

Home

Available Pets

Adoptable Dogs

Pet Profile

Pet-match Quiz

Low-fidelity Usability Testing

  • Participants: 5 individuals (2 women, 3 men)
  • Age Range: 31 to 70 years old
  • Methodology: Conducted usability testing with the low-fidelity prototype to evaluate the ease of use, functionality, and overall user experience of key features. The goal was to identify usability issues, gather feedback, and suggest improvements based on user interactions with the platform.

Tasks to be completed

  • Find and view Bubble’s (the dog) pet profile
  • Find your ideal pet-match
  • Adopt a dog (Bubbles)

Insights

  • Participants found the design intuitive and easy to navigate
  • Some participants found the design intuitive and easy to navigate
  • One participant suggested denoting whether a pet is good with other pets and/or children
  • Some participants wanted additional background on the pet’s origin
  • Participants felt the pet-match quiz was the right length and addressed their concerns
  • Some participants wanted the ability to specify preferences for senior or special-needs pets separately
  • Participants expected clearer confirmation that the pet is reserved after submitting the application
  • Some participants suggested strengthening the language to clearly indicate when a pet has been reserved
  • Participants felt the platform made the adoption process easier and more efficient

Next steps

  • Streamline navigation to make "Watch Later" easier to find
  • Rename "Past" section to reduce confusion
  • Conduct further usability testing for improved intuitiveness
  • Add something to pet profiles to denote whether a pet is good with other pets and/or children
  • Provide additional background as to where the pet came from within the pet profile
  • Add an additional question to the pet-match quiz regarding pet allergies
  • Separate the preferences for senior or special needs pets into two distinct pages
  • Add stronger language to provide clearer confirmation that the pet is reserved

High-fidelity Wireframes

I developed high-fidelity wireframes to provide more detailed visual elements and interactions, ensuring the design was ready for prototyping and user testing.

Home

Available Pets

Adoptable Dogs

Pet Profile

Pet-match Quiz

High-fidelity Usability Testing

  • Participants: 5 individuals (2 women, 3 men)
  • Age Range: 31 to 70 years old
  • Methodology: Conducted usability testing with the high-fidelity prototype to assess the visual design, interaction flow, and overall user experience of key features. The goal was to validate design decisions, refine functionality, and gather user feedback to enhance clarity, efficiency, and engagement before final implementation.

Tasks to be completed

  • Use filters to locate your ideal dog
  • Watch a video of Bubbles to better understand his personality
  • Add an adoption kit to your cart after completing the adoption application

Insights

  • Participants found the platform intuitive and easy to navigate
  • Participants felt that the filters were easy to locate and use
  • Some participants found it difficult to locate the “Watch Video” button
  • Some participants wanted more pet history details (e.g., stray, surrendered)
  • Participants felt that the adoption process was clear, but some wanted a progress bar and a meeting option
  • Adoption kits were easy to find, and their placement in the flow felt logical
  • Participants felt the application gave the impression that purchasing an adoption kit was required

Next steps

  • Consider adding new filter options (spayed/neutered, potty-trained, additional colors)
  • Make the pet video button clearer with a tag like "Watch Video" or "Get to Know Me"
  • Include pet history on profiles to create a stronger emotional connection
  • Add a progress bar to the mobile adoption application for better user guidance
  • Provide an option to opt out of adoption kits to avoid feeling obligated to purchase
  • Add a clear adoption completion confirmation page after the user signs
  • Adjust the “previous pet experience” page so fields only appear if a user has owned pets before

Iterations

Priority Revisions

I iterated on the design based on feedback from usability testing, addressing issues like improving navigation, clarifying button labels, and enhancing the appointment management process for a smoother user experience.

Testing revealed that some participants wanted the option to meet a pet before finalizing adoption. A button was added to pet profiles, allowing users to schedule a meeting directly from the profile page.
Testing showed that users desired more background on each pet. A pet history section was added to profiles, providing details on where the pet came from and any relevant past experiences.
Testing indicated that users wanted clearer visibility into their progress during the adoption process. A progress bar was added to the adoption flow, helping users track their steps from start to completion.
Testing revealed that users wanted a way to review their application prior to submission. An application review page was added, allowing adopters to verify and confirm their information before finalizing.

Final Design

After implementing priority revisions based on usability testing feedback, I finalized the design, ensuring a seamless user experience, improved functionality, and a visually cohesive interface.

Available Pets

Adoptable Dogs

Pet Profile

Pet-matching Quiz

Application Complete